|
Compared to Category 5 copper, optical
fiber offers you better network performance and is easier
to install and test for a comparable cost. Fiber,
with its virtually unlimited bandwidth, unsurpassed
reliability, and ability to support all current and
future protocols, is the natural choice for communication
planners. Three common misconceptions
have kept people from taking advantage of the medium:
- fiber-optic technology is too
expensive
- fiber is difficult to install
- and copper cabling solutions
will not meet their current and future requirements
These widely held beliefs are not
true in today's environment, fiber-optic technology is
clearly the right choice, all the way to the desktop.
Until recently, copper was
the clear winner in a straight cost comparison. However,
recent developments have closed the gap, bringing fiber
and copper closer to cost parity -- especially for high
performance requirements.
There are two primary factors which
have changed the cost equation:
- Fiber-based solutions cost less.
Advances in fiber technology, higher fiber production,
more affordable system electronics, and a growing
base of technicians trained to install and test fiber
have lowered the costs associated with fiber. There
is no longer a significant premium associated with
installing fiber systems. In addition, optical fiber's
superior reliability reduces operating costs over
the life of a network by reducing the occurrence of
outages.
- Copper based solutions cost
more.
Stringent Telecommunications Industry Association
(TIA) requirements established in ANSI/TIA/EIA-568A
for Category 5 cables have increased the costs of
installing and testing unshielded twisted pair (UTP).
Can Copper compete?
Choosing the transmission medium
for your network involves more than just selecting the
most cost effective solution for today's network. To
ensure the long-term reliability and performance of
your system, it also is important to choose a medium
that can support your network requirements into the
future.
While many network planners hope
they can upgrade their existing copper systems to support
new high-speed protocols, the fact is that very little
of the current installed base -- mostly Category 3 cable
can support high data rate transmissions. Upgrading
to support 100 Mbps often requires pulling Category
5 cable and installing Category 5 outlets and patch
panels, incurring expensive cable plant replacement
and redesign. Copper upgrades demand more stringent
installation, routing, testing, and warranty procedures.
In addition, the copper industry already shows signs
of moving to higher performance grades of cable and
connectors.
Installing fiber, on the other
hand, effectively 'future-proofs" your system. Optical
fiber's high bandwidth supports all current and proposed
protocols without laying new cable. A single fiber cable
specification encompasses the full spectrum of fiber-based
LAN options, including Ethernet (10 Base-F), Token Ring,
fiber distributed data interface (FDDI), asynchronous
transfer mode (ATM), fiber channel, and enterprise system
connection (ESCON). All specify multi-mode fiber with
the same physical mid optical parameters.
Copper's susceptibility to electromagnetic
interference (EMI)/radio frequency interference (RFI),
crosstalk, attenuation, jitter, and impedance mismatches
especially at high data rates -- requires care during
installation. When installing UTP, you must avoid electrical
machinery, heat sources, high-voltage transmission systems,
and other EMI/RFI sources, which may limit or compromise
your network design.
Since optical fiber is immune to
EMI/RFI interference and crosstalk, fiber-based LANs
reduce error rates from a few per minute with copper
to a few per' month -even at Data rates in excess of
one gigabit per second.
Optical fiber's low attenuation
and high bandwidth also give you the ability to transmit
signals over longer distances, thereby increasing the
flexibility of your design. The IEEE 802.3 10 Base F
(Ethernet) standards allow operation at distances of
up to 2 kilometers over fiber, but only 150 meters using
Category 5 UTP. Similarly, the IEEE 802.5J Token Ring
standard supports transmission distances of up to 2
kilometers using fiber, but only 180 meters using Category
5 UTP.
Installing and maintenance
People who have not worked with
fiber before may be surprised to lean that it is easy
to install. In fact, many technicians prefer to work
with fiber cable because of its smaller diameter and
lighter weight. Improvements in fiber-optic terminations
make them as easy, if not easier, to terminate than
Category 5 connectors. Fiber can withstand greater pulling
tension and has greater crush resistance than Category
5 cable -- while Category 5 UTP can withstand up ro
25 pounds of pulling force, fiber cable can withstand
more than 150 pounds.
Fiber cable is easier to maintain
than copper cable. According to a 1992 user study that
appeared in an industry publication, copper-based systems
average 2.3 outages per year, caused primarily by EMI,
RFI, crosstalk, impedance mismatches, and excessive
transmission distances. Optical fiber's immunity to
these factors increase network reliability by 60 to
80 percent.
While copper may seem like a familiar
medium to install, Category 5 copper has more stringent
installation requirements than other copper cables,
many of which are just coming to light. Perhaps the
most problematic issue is testing. Current test methods
for Category 5 are not standardized and cannot guarantee
future network performance. In addition, Category 5
test equipment is expensive, requires substantial training,
and is just becoming available. Finally, since there
are no industry-standard installer certification programs
yet, it is difficult to identify contractors who are
trained in Category 5 installation techniques.
Fiber testing, on the other hand,
is simple, reliable, and requires only inexpensive equipment.
Because fiber facilities are not affected by near-end
crosstalk (NEXT), they generally can be tested by injecting
calibrated light into one end of a fiber and measuring
the light returned on the other end with a power meter.
If the attenuation is within standard parameters, the
system will operate over that fiber.
To help you make an educated decision
about the transmission medium for your fiber to the
desk (FTTD) application, the Fiber-Optic LAN Section
(FOLS) of the TIA is a valuable resource. The FOLS is
a consortium of leading fiber-optic cable, component,
and electronics manufacturers. The FOLS focuses on educating
end users and influencer's about the technical advantages
and affordability of optical transmission in local area
networks and fiber to the desk applications.
|